Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Keegan Rice Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Rice analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Nick Chappell vs Keegan Rice Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 0 Rice
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 48.45% of points on their second serve, while Rice has won 32.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 49.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rice has won 52.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.52% and 34.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rice has saved 51.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 45.71% of matches played (W/L 32/ 38), with Rice winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 150), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Rice has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17), where as Rice has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chappell winning 1 times and Rice being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chappell winning 2 and Rice winning 0. The last match between Chappell and Rice was at the Granby Challenger, 16-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Nick Chappell getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Rice have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chappell winning 0 times and Rice 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 0, and Rice 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.57 while Rice has played against players with an average rank of 127.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rice has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 39.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rice has converted 57.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
482
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
53% (303-269)
Career Total W/L
13% (1-7)
40% (12-18)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nick Chappell vs Keegan Rice For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chappell VS Rice
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Nick Chappell | Keegan Rice |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:31 | 1:9:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (36/57) | 74% (35/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (30/36) | 57% (20/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 25% (3/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (24/47) | 30% (17/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Keegan Rice
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Keegan Rice |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (12/18) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (29/40) | 29% (2/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (304/334) | 35% (20/37) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 75 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.63 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1238/2012) | 59% (114/192) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (817/1238) | 55% (63/114) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (375/774) | 32% (25/78) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (84/211) | 57% (8/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (807/2095) | 40% (66/163) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (10/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (12/30) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 33% (3/1) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Nick Chappell
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nick Chappell
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Nick Chappell
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Keegan Rice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Keegan Rice
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Rice
Player
Filip Apltauer
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
47 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Keegan Rice
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Keegan Rice
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Keegan Rice
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Chappell Vs Rice Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chappell are available here and Rice photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
